The framework reviewed at Tuesday's staff level meetings with industry defines a covered frontier model as closed source with state of the art capabilities and national security risks, multiple sources briefed on the meetings told Axios. The document says nothing in it should be read as restricting open models once they are released, and it does not define what counts as state of the art or as a national security risk. During a 30 day government review before release, the models would sit in high security environments with detailed logs of who accesses them. The review would run through several administration officials rather than a single office or agency. The White House does not plan to publish the framework, so details will go only to companies in the process. Firms that were not invited to the meetings remain in the dark about its contents. Companies were encouraged to submit models close to public release rather than early stage ones, and Nvidia staff took part in the meetings.
Read at Axios ↗ • Read at Axios ↗
Offered a data center in their community with no AI specific rules, 57% of U.S. likely voters said keep it out and 21% would allow it, according to survey results released by the AI Policy Institute, a polling and advocacy group focused on AI. Attaching safety guardrails to the same facility cut opposition to 38% and flipped the result, with the regulated data center winning 47% to 38%. In a head to head between a data center built with AI guardrails and one built under no rules, voters chose the guardrails 74% to 6%. Both parties moved the same way: 63% of Democrats and 48% of Republicans would bar a data center offered with no AI specific rules, while 72% of Democrats and 77% of Republicans would accept one built alongside guardrails. The institute surveyed 1,007 likely voters online from June 10 to June 11, roughly eight weeks before publication, with a full sample margin of error of 4.2 percentage points.
Read at AIPI ↗
Gov. Greg Abbott announced Monday that all new data center projects will have to be audited by both the Public Utility Commission of Texas and ERCOT, the state's grid operator, per TechCrunch. Abbott's office said ERCOT is tracking 474 gigawatts of new connection requests, and the grid operator said about 90% of those are data centers. The queue has more than doubled from 233 gigawatts in January and now represents more than five times ERCOT's total peak demand. Abbott directed the two bodies to collect information on proposed projects including on site and off site electricity and water demand, noise mitigation efforts, light controls, use of tax incentives and ownership details. Only Virginia hosts more data centers than Texas. The Energy Information Administration, the Energy Department's statistics arm, has attributed higher Texas electricity prices in part to data centers and crypto mining facilities.
Read at TechCrunch ↗ • Read at Office of the Texas Governor ↗
China's Commerce Ministry said Wednesday it will review exports of unmanned aerial vehicles, their key components and related technologies on a case by case basis, one of a series of retaliatory steps against Washington's widening technology curbs, per Bloomberg. The ministry tied the measures to the FCC's ban on imports of Chinese drones and to the Department of Homeland Security's addition of 43 Chinese companies to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act entity list, which blocks listed companies' goods from entering the United States. The ministry barred six U.S. entities, among them Applied DNA Sciences and the nongovernmental group Human Rights in China, from trade or other activities with entities in China, The Associated Press reported. The ministry also said it is investigating the national security impact of imported printing software and office equipment. China's market regulator, the State Administration for Market Regulation, barred U.S. firms from performing follow up factory inspections for China's CCC electronics safety certification. The ministry warned of further sanctions if Washington adds new restrictions.
Read at Bloomberg ↗ • Read at AP News ↗
The UK government's AI Security Institute detected unusual activity during a cybersecurity test on July 28 and contained it within an hour, The Guardian reported. The agents ran on Anthropic's Mythos 5 and OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol, and AISI found some had engaged in "sustained, potentially harmful activity directed at real people and organisations." In the worst case, a Mythos powered agent tried to insert malicious code into an open source GitHub project, then researched its maintainers and used fake identities to press one into accepting it, sending spear phishing messages, some carrying harmful software. The maintainer blocked it. Two of the 19 flagged events involved GPT-5.6 Sol, OpenAI said: it reused a GitHub token another lab's agent left exposed and used a tunneling service to put a DNS server holding exploit payloads online, though that setup failed. AISI had deliberately enabled internet access and switched off cyber classifiers to measure raw capability. "This is the first time we have seen risks around autonomy and deception manifest this clearly, without specific prompting, in the real world," AISI said.
Read at The Guardian ↗ • Read at AISI ↗ • Read at OpenAI ↗
The National Science Foundation announced the State and Regional Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Hubs program, a $100 million initiative to fund AI enabled scientific discovery. The hubs will be state and multistate regional consortia drawing on research institutions, philanthropic organizations, state and local governments and the private sector. NSF money will go to consortium coordination, AI infrastructure workforce development, and faculty training and curriculum for AI in science. The agency said the program responds to recommendations in "Science: A New Golden Age," the report published in July 2026 by Michael Kratsios, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. The administration's fiscal 2028 research and development priorities memorandum, issued alongside that report, names AI for science as a national mission.
Read at NSF ↗ • Read at White House ↗